Training >> Browse Articles >> Tactical / SWAT


Using the Tactical Combat Fighting Stance

Using the Tactical Combat Fighting Stance

Officers practice the Tactical Combat Fighting Stance. (Photo: APC)

By: Arthur Randolph, APCLLC Training Consultant

What is the best stance for officers in the field to work from that gives the most options in the most situations they may face while on duty? Debated and discussed often and especially during firearms training, it comes down to what they were taught and its compatibility to basic body functions under stress. Deciding what to present to students can be a challenge as well. Long standing training standards have focused on score based, distance specific courses. The courses lend themselves to stances that accomplish high score but are not readily transferable to the actual environment officers work in once they leave the range. While most range operations focus on a down range only target area, the street demands the 360 mindset. The tactics and techniques we as instructors teach our personnel need to be in line with the street, not the range.

At the range, I watch what the officers do on the line related to stances, how well they perform tasks and what is the overall outcome. Were they able to shoot accurately? Did they remain aware of the surrounding areas, move smoothly between positions or points of cover, and how fast did they get tired when covering threats for an extended period of time. Although the isosceles stance is an easy platform to shoot from, I would not want to hold a rifle or shotgun from the stance after 10 minutes.

The APCLLC staff use the, Tactical Combat Fighting Stance™ (TCFS™). The goal has been working a stance that can apply to firearms or less lethal force options, and uses natural body motions. The stance focuses on 4 elements:

1. Tactical: A well thought out plan. Going out on the streets with a “wing it” mindset gives the advantage to an adversary in a confrontation.

2. Combat: Armed confrontations are a reality of law enforcement that can occur in any community at any time.

3. Fighting: Force options to overcome resistance or repel a physical assault.

4. Stance: A body posture as a platform to apply tactics and techniques.

The stance is structured with the operator’s strong side foot half a step back from the support side foot. The knees are bent slightly to lower the body’s center of gravity, the upper body is bent forward at the hips which balances the upper body and improves long arm or side arm presentation, or empty hand movement. The end result is a stance that is stable 360 degrees. There are several advantages with the stance. The officer is facing the primary threat area but retains mobility to change direction rapidly. The stance is transferable in that it is applicable to long arm, side arm, or empty hand tactics. A lowered center of gravity helps absorb the recoil from a weapon being fired. There is greater stability if someone were to bump or shove the officer from a side or from behind, and the ability to maintain position for longer periods of time with less fatigue.

Teaching the stance like anything else can be a challenge and especially when introducing a new technique to officers who have done something the same way for a long time. We recognize that this is a way but not the only way. Presenting to officers from this point of view removes a perception of arrogance or being a “know it all” type instructor. Encourage them to test and compare this stance to what has been used in the past. Have an instructor or a participant take other stances. Push from different directions to test overall stability. With arms extended push down or back on the hands to simulate the recoil of a weapon. During each demonstration, watch for how much movement there is. How easily can the participant drop to a low position while staying focused on a target? At the end of the day take out on the road what works best for each.

For many of us, seeing is believing. At a recent course for firearms instructors, I found just explaining the stance and talking participants through it wasn’t connecting with all of them. I asked one of the participants to help to demonstrate the stance with me. I had him face me, and stand off center. He placed his support side forearm across my chest and was asked to adjust his posture to counter my weight as I leaned into his arm. In a few seconds he had moved into the TCFS™ without further instruction. The stance now made sense and he could compare it to what he had been doing in the past.

Further proof that the stance was workable in a wide range of situations came with the courses of fire that where conducted. Since they were not static but included various challenges from shooting on the move to multiple positions, each participant had substantial time to evaluate for themselves. The end result was a better prepared officer.

As I stated in the beginning, this is a way not the only way. It is a fluid stance that works in many situations and conditions. From empty hand to long arms the stance is a solid platform to work from.

  • Photo_user_blank_big


    9 days ago


    I've not seen it mentioned, so I will here. Once you arrive and begin your interview, that is the moment you place your body in a tactical position. Always alert and at the ready for anything that may happen. This not only assures your able to defend or assault if need be, but as important shows a sign of strength and professionalism that goes a long way in possibly not needing to use it at all. To many times I have seen a relaxed approach, when there is no signs of an obvious combatant.

  • 10173740_280469362151488_2138136795935452954_n_max50


    7 months ago


    very good knowledge! Thumbs up!

  • Drknite_max50


    10 months ago


    That stance is good for transitioning from interview to combat quickly, weather shooting or H2H combat. I've been using that stance for awhile now, it has a more natural and fluid feel when I have to move quickly.

  • Steven_82_338_max50


    12 months ago


    Very good knowledge!

  • Csi_logo_max50


    over 1 year ago


    Vreat Article

  • Photo_user_blank_big


    over 1 year ago


    Very good article

  • 2012-12-21_25252022


    over 1 year ago


    Very good article

  • Christmas_2010_038_max50


    almost 2 years ago


    I taught that to a young marine LT that was going to be deployed and had not used his M-9 much. Turns out it probably saved his life and the rest of his team, one afternoon in Bagdad. They fought their way out of a Kill zone, walking and accurate shooting.

  • Tribb_max50


    about 2 years ago


    Great article, but prefer the Weaver stance as I can easily move and become a smaller target for my target. Slow is smooth and smooth is fast ;)

  • Edres_max50


    over 2 years ago


    Experience Plays a vital role in performing under pressure and in high stress situations. Get use to your adrenaline pumping, get In the ring, mma anything goes get as close to the real situation as possible. You will not find weapons in the ring other than your opponent but, you will physically and mentally benefit and perform better in the field from the practice. Lift weights, heavy bag, speed bag, spar break your self down to the last point possible then hit the shooting course. Practice completely fatigued will give you the greatest results in return. There is no Gain without pain, If your not throwing up or dry heaving your not training hard enough!

  • Dsc03092_max50


    over 2 years ago


    Great article,and I agree with hkgirl. I was trained in the weaver stance and had used that stance for probably ten years. Our training and standards then went back to the isosceles, I still catch myself going back to the weaver and I'm the most comfortable with it.

  • Img_1008_max50


    over 2 years ago


    Though I'm not a LEO (yet) I'm sure this info will be very helpful when training time rolls around. Thanks so much for this!

  • Arizona_desktop_max50


    over 2 years ago


    I was trained that the Isosceles stance was the best for the purposes of protection as far as a vest goes, but the Weaver stance presents less body mass (but no, or very little vest protection). I really don't have a preference other than I feel most comfortable with the Weaver stance. I do think, though, that exposed body mass is my biggest concern with it.

  • Dscn0191_max50


    over 2 years ago


    Very Helpful and contains a lot of detailed information...

  • Dc4d5b0451333872_max50


    almost 3 years ago


    Great article

PoliceLink School Finder

Save time in your search for a degree program. Use PoliceLink's School Finder to locate schools online and in your area.

* In the event that we cannot find a program from one of our partner schools that matches your specific area of interest, we may show schools with similar or unrelated programs.

Recent Activity

SE851 posted: "How true this is", 21 minutes ago.
SE851 posted in: "How true this is", 21 minutes ago.
Doanerev24 received the quiz result of "You passed, but just barely", about 1 hour ago.
SBallard14 received the quiz result of "You passed, but just barely", about 1 hour ago.
StrykerBrig21 posted in: "Prayer Request/Guidance", about 1 hour ago.