Print

Training >> Browse Articles >> Legal & Liability

Rate

Restraint of Autistic Student doesn’t Seize “Excessive Force” Standard

A difficult issue in the school setting is use of force to control students and maintain a safe environment. This issue is more difficult when dealing with students who have disabilities that place them in special education. A recent case from Mississippi provides an example of how courts will analyze such uses of force under state law.

In Pigford v. Jackson Public School District, 2005 Miss. App. LEXIS 90 (Mississippi Ct. App. 2005), the court examined the case of Jacob Pigford, who was described as an autistic student who “could not speak and had the maturity level of a three year old. Jacob was subject to unpredictable outbursts triggered by a variety of things, including sudden noises, unfamiliar surroundings, and unfamiliar persons. Occasionally, Jacob would twirl, spin around, run uncontrollably flaring his arms, hit other students, or drop to the floor and refuse to respond to instructions from his parents or teachers.”

On November 15, 1999, Jacob’s regular teacher was busy with a parent-teacher meeting and was unable to escort Jacob to class. Instead, a teacher’s aide, Magill Jones, and another teacher escorted Jacob. When the bell rang causing a rush of students in the hallway, Jacob began having an anxiety attack. Jones attempted to restrain Jacob by holding his arms, and at one point, trying to lift him off the ground by his arms. This attempt at restraining Jacob left bruising on Jacob’s arms, prompting his parents to file a lawsuit against the school, Jacob’s teacher, and the teacher’s aide.

In reviewing the case, the court noted that under Mississippi state law, before a teacher or school official could be found liable based upon issues of “corporal punishment or the taking of an action to maintain control and discipline of students,” the plaintiff would have to show that the actions of the school official were taken in “bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting a wanton or willful disregard of human rights or safety.” The court, in applying this standard to the facts here, concluded that Jacob’s parents would not be able to prove that the actions of the teacher’s aide were willful and wanton. Accordingly, their suit based on excessive force failed.

The Pigfords also claimed that the school failed to provide Jacob with a reasonably safe environment. The parents alleged that the school should have had procedures in place such that Jacob would not encounter crowds. The court noted that the “Individuals with Disabilities Act” (IDEA) requires schools to mainstream special education students to the degree possible and provide the least restrictive environment. Further restrictions on Jacob in restricting his ability to be in the hallways with other students would likely fly in the face of this concept. Further, if Jacob’s parents had a concern over this issue, they could have raised it when Jacob’s IEP (Individualized Educational Plan) was created. The court concluded that the school had not failed to provide a safe environment.


Rate
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    PurpleHope

    over 1 year ago

    16 Comments

    I wish something like this would happen in every school! But, unfortunately people aim only for the academic success and therefore forget about their planet. A safe environment isn't something to kid about.

PoliceLink School Finder

Save time in your search for a criminal justice degree program. Use PoliceLink's School Finder to locate schools online and in your area.

Get Info

* In the event that we cannot find a program from one of our partner schools that matches your specific area of interest, we may show schools with similar or unrelated programs.

Recent Activity

Photo_user_blank_big
dash received the quiz result of "You passed, but just barely", about 2 hours ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
Taylorg received the quiz result of "You passed, but just barely", about 2 hours ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
janke1010 received the quiz result of "You did not receive a passing score", about 2 hours ago.
2_max30
wcsdc4 is ranked No.1 for the day in PoliceTrivia, about 2 hours ago.
2_max30
wcsdc4 is ranked No.1 for the day in PoliceTrivia, about 2 hours ago.