Group Forums >> Concealed Carry Advocates / Opposition Discussion Group >> U.N. wants to take away our gun rights!

-4

U.N. wants to take away our gun rights!

1,874 Views
46 Replies Flag as inappropriate

-2 posts

back to top

Posted over 4 years ago

 

Did you know that the United Nations is trying to pass an International Treaty that would supercede our Constitution, and our right to own and bear arms??? Check it out.  I added a video in the video area, that you can also find on You Tube... Check it out and write to ALL of your senators, Congressmen & women and governors, to let them know how you feel about this!!!

Wcsa_range_deane_p7240007_max50

413 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

I see this as possibly the biggest threat to our 2nd Amendment rights.  If they get a treaty ratified here, it would bypass the regular checks and balances within our government.  NOT good.


They've been trying to do this since something like 2002-2004, but the latest ambassador seems on board with a treaty.  Truly scary....

Steve_mcqueen_max50

884 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

 And to think that when I made my statements about the President signing the  Amendment to the Interpol ability to ARREST , SEIZE , AND NOT REPORT OR BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE TO THE CONSTITUTION , it was met with "interpol has no Police or Police Authority". Well yes it does in out own ranks we have "INTERPOL OFFICERS" that are Local , State , and Federal and those exceptions that lead to a Form of Martial Law can be utilized with the Amendment that was signed in early January.


Glory earned on the field of battle , can never be taken away , you take it with you to the grave. Quote by General George Armstrong Custer

Evil_max50

7070 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

The UN can go pound sand!!!


You have the rest of your life to solve the problem, how long your life lasts depends on how well you do it. -Clint Smith

Respect it

Packerbacker_max50

4532 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

Bump to what scurge says!


 


speed's the key.. when in doubt punch it out

Steve_mcqueen_max50

884 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

Your statement about INTERPOL never having directed U.S.Police is correct ( BECAUSE THEY WERE NEVER GIVEN THE POWER TO DO SO UNTIL OBAMA SIGNED THE E.O. INTO EFFECT, "NOW THEY CAN"). The Freedom of Information Act is in fact an American Safeguard against a "Tyrannical Government run Amok". Now with the "Diplomatic Immunity" the American Officers that are attached to INTERPOL have , they may direct "ANY AMERICAN POLICE AGENCY" to do there bidding without any "OVERSITE BY THE CONGRESS" , while here in the United States. ( They can do what ever they want , arrest who ever they want , for what ever reason they want , without any warrants , without any probable cause , hold and detain for what ever time or reason without any "OVERSITE" , AND "total diplomatic immunity".

"now please show me any place in the united states constitution that allows that". You will only find that type of "ENFORCEMENT" in European Countries with "SOCIALISTIC GOVERNMENTS". We are approaching the so called "SLIPPERY SLOPE ON THE U.S.CONSTITUTION". We are slowly but methodically being changed over to the European Style of Socialism.


 "OBAMA FISCALLY BOWED DOWN TO A FOREIGN HEAD OF STATE" ,THAT WAS SO EVIDENT THAT "HELLEN KELLER" COULD SEE IT. The spin masters have been doing there best but the fact remains that he "Bowed Down" making him a "FAILURE TO THE DIGNIFICATION OF OFFICE TO THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES". The "APOLOGY" tour he took begging forgiveness from the Foreign Powers for American Super Power Status is encouraging every "Two Bit" Third World Nation to take pot shots at us "BECAUSE WE ARE SHOWING SIGNS OF WEAKNESS AS A SUPER POWER".

President Obama is the final orator in the conversion process. It has nothing to do with Political Affiliation. It started with Bush 01. , then Clinton , then Bush 11 , now Obama.


By the way the Obama Administration is "STILL BLAMING BUSH FOR EVERYTHING" and all because of some "emasculated leadership now in power". Liberalism is a disease and flourishing in Washington these days and there is no discernible difference between Liberalism and Socialism. Both make the people "TOTALLY DEPENDANT" on Government period..


 


Glory earned on the field of battle , can never be taken away , you take it with you to the grave. Quote by General George Armstrong Custer

Avatar_wild_max50

5501 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 


Heroes Live Forever!

-85 posts

back to top
+1

Rated +1 | Posted over 4 years ago

 

Pedal2Metal says ...



Bump to what scurge says!


 


Molon labe U.N.


-44 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

Here we go rustling the feathers of the conspiracy theorists.

45089_396847393722850_1055776862_n_max50

4256 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

 As we say in Hotlanta... "Oh no they don't!" LOL But seriously, this better not happen.  I have a pistol and two rifles I use for protection.  As a human being, I should have every right to protect myself.  I"m sick to death to read this article.  I pray this doesn't happen.  


The glory of young men is their strength: and the beauty of old men is the grey head
- Proverbs 20:29

Nemo me impune lacessit

YaYa SuzieQ

Photobucket

Ferret_max50

582 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

Didn't Americans engage in war in the year of 1775 to liberate themselves from such authorities? Yep ... the American Revolutionary War! And now it seems we're starting to fall under the same rule by similar authorities? This time, it's gun control ... then what next? I'm sure at least one of our leaders can see the potential "failure" with this. Then again, I guess history repeats itself at some point in time.


The integrity of your word is its greatest respect! - "Talon"

Dcp01604_max50

72 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

Before posting you should check your facts.   Read factcheck.org at this link.   http://www.factcheck.org/2009/12/international-gun-ban-treaty/

Dcp01604_max50

72 posts

back to top
+2

Rated +2 | Posted over 4 years ago

 

ilegworldchamp says ...



 And to think that when I made my statements about the President signing the  Amendment to the Interpol ability to ARREST , SEIZE , AND NOT REPORT OR BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE TO THE CONSTITUTION , it was met with "interpol has no Police or Police Authority". Well yes it does in out own ranks we have "INTERPOL OFFICERS" that are Local , State , and Federal and those exceptions that lead to a Form of Martial Law can be utilized with the Amendment that was signed in early January.



 


Though your statement is half correct.  Maybe you should read this:


Interpol Under Siege by Uninformed Bloggers

Mark Leon Goldberg - December 23, 2009 - 5:29 pm


 



  • Critic Watch

  • Security

 

Last week, the Obama Administration issued an executive order that extended certain diplomatic privileges to Interpol--the International Criminal Police Organization.  This was a pretty innocuous bureaucratic move, but it has apparently sparked some serious concerns among a certain cadre of blogger.  For example, you have Steve Shippert and Clyde Middleton of ThreatsWatch worrying that this "could conceivably include...Americans arrested on our soil by INTERPOL officers."  And Andy McCarthy of National Review writes,



"This international police force...will be unrestrained by the U.S. Constitution and American law while it operates in the United States and affects both Americans and American interests outside the United States...Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies?"



Both McCarthy and the ThreatsWatch duo's understanding of how Interpol works seems to be heavily shaped by fiction and film. In real life,  Interpol is also not an "international police force."  This would imply that Interpol is composed of units of officers that can chase criminals across the world, Jason Bourne style.   In fact, there is no such thing as an "Interpol officer," as such.  Rather, law enforcement officers from Interpol's member states are seconded to the organization from national law enforcement agencies, like the FBI, U.S. Marshals, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, ect. 


This is not just a semantic distinction. Officers seconded to Interpol do not have any sort of transnational executive arrest power.   Rather, officers seconded to Interpol do things like coordinate busts of international child pornography rings.  The people actually making the arrests, though, are members of the national law enforcement of the country where the crimes are committed.  They are not "Interpol Officers" --  because there is no such thing as an "Interpol Officer."  Further, "Interpol" can't arrest an American on American soil, a Canadian on Canadian soil or a Rwandan on a Rwandan soil. Only national law enforcement can do that. 


As to the specific reaon why the Obama administration would decide, last week, to extend to Interpol the same suite of diplomatic privileges that are typically accorded to international organizations?  I don't have a good answer for that. My sense is that it probably has something to with the accessibility of Interpol's secure criminal databases (on things like stolen passports and the like).  But that is a question that could pretty easily be answered by a phone call to the Justice Department. 


I can say with authority that stoking concerns about Interpol whisking Americans away is un-informed fear mongering. 


*For the record, I worked at Interpol's Headquarters in Lyon France in 2002.

 

Snapshot_e_max50

20 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

taking away gun control isnt right and hopefully wont happen, all in all the polotics part of it is leading slowly but surely to end time prophesies of one world goverment, for anyone who is interested in that

-85 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

So fact check says Obama wants to look into banning imports and exports of weopons? It is unlikely that personal gun ownership could be outlawed in the U.S. in the way described in the thread. But, people should be wary of any gun laws proposed or any gun treaties proposed under this president or any other. He has a history of being anti-gun. I have heard speaches by BHO that state people don't have any reason to own guns. It's on the web. I will try to find it for reference if I have to. His voting record from what I have read and heard is also anti gun ownership. Regardless of what is fact or fiction, Americans should be on guard to protect the 2A because there are many out there that wish to disarm law abiding Americans by passing laws that really only hurt good people in order to gain or keep support of a misguided group or satisfiy a unrealistic expectation that could never stop criminals from harming others.

Pug_max600_max50

417 posts

back to top
+1

Rated +1 | Posted over 4 years ago

 

The UN Charter does not gave them the sight to superseed invidual state laws. Not to worry.

-44 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

j_mrhoads says ...



taking away gun control isnt right and hopefully wont happen, all in all the polotics part of it is leading slowly but surely to end time prophesies of one world goverment, for anyone who is interested in that



1) Taking away gun control isn't right? Read that out loud to yourself.


2)polotics = Politics


3)porphesies = Prophecies


4)goverment = Government


5) Work on puncuation. Placement and usage, as well as capitalization.


 

-77 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

Photo_user_banned_big

83 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

Even if they said you can't carry a gun, would you stop? My life depends on mine. I'd carry it no matter what. I'd think everyone would do the same.

-91 posts

back to top
+1

Rated +1 | Posted over 4 years ago

 

wonshot1 says ...



Pedal2Metal says ...



Bump to what scurge says!


 


Molon labe U.N.




Precisely.

-2 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

This is not a conspiracy theory.  It is FACT!  So what are we going to do about it?  Just complaining will get us no where.  What are you going to do about it???

45089_396847393722850_1055776862_n_max50

4256 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

Yes, I didn't think this was a conspiracy at all.  I am fighting for my rights to bear arms aka Second Amendment.  I believe President Nobama doesn't want Americans to be able to bear arms.  Anyways, I need to educate myself here so I won't be an ignorant American.  


 


cspdmac024 says ...



This is not a conspiracy theory.  It is FACT!  So what are we going to do about it?  Just complaining will get us no where.  What are you going to do about it???



The glory of young men is their strength: and the beauty of old men is the grey head
- Proverbs 20:29

Nemo me impune lacessit

YaYa SuzieQ

Photobucket

-2 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

More importantly, EVERYONE needs to be on a letter writing campaign to all of your senators, congressmen & women and governors out there, letting them know just how you feel on this subject.  Take a stand for you rights and beliefs......

-91 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

How many here are NRA members?

Evil_max50

7070 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

I was at a while ago. I let my membership lapse when I got tired of being called every other week to get money out of me. I was going through a hard time in my life. The ex left me and I was broke. I literally had no money. That did not stop the calls. I explained I had no money I would if I could but I had NO $$. Their response, Sorry to hear that about a smalled donation then?

Kind of soured me on the NRA.


You have the rest of your life to solve the problem, how long your life lasts depends on how well you do it. -Clint Smith

Respect it

-91 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

I understand, but they are the largest lobbying voice for the 2nd Ammendment around.

Evil_max50

7070 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

Thats a fact but I tend to hold a grudge for awhile.  I been tossing around renewing my membership now that I am not flat broke anymore.  I just dread the calls if I do.


You have the rest of your life to solve the problem, how long your life lasts depends on how well you do it. -Clint Smith

Respect it

-91 posts

back to top
+1

Rated +1 | Posted over 4 years ago

 

I ponied up and got a life membership. They don't bug me too much.

Evil_max50

7070 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

ShockUSMC87 says ...



Its a chain email that was started as a prank. The treaty isnt true and they are just trying to rowl people up.


My god people....if they started a chain email that the world was gonna end tomorrow people would believe and freak.


Relax and live a little.......



Haven't you heard its suppose to end 12/21/2012 according to the mayan calendar


You have the rest of your life to solve the problem, how long your life lasts depends on how well you do it. -Clint Smith

Respect it

-91 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 4 years ago

 

Scurge says ...



ShockUSMC87 says ...



Its a chain email that was started as a prank. The treaty isnt true and they are just trying to rowl people up.


My god people....if they started a chain email that the world was gonna end tomorrow people would believe and freak.


Relax and live a little.......



Haven't you heard its suppose to end 12/21/2012 according to the mayan calendar



Yep, I'm prepared. Ready for the friggin' zombies too 


 


Next Page >