Did you know that the United Nations is trying to pass an International Treaty that would supercede our Constitution, and our right to own and bear arms??? Check it out.  I added a video in the video area, that you can also find on You Tube... Check it out and write to ALL of your senators, Congressmen & women and governors, to let them know how you feel about this!!!

 And to think that when I made my statements about the President signing the  Amendment to the Interpol ability to ARREST , SEIZE , AND NOT REPORT OR BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE TO THE CONSTITUTION , it was met with "interpol has no Police or Police Authority". Well yes it does in out own ranks we have "INTERPOL OFFICERS" that are Local , State , and Federal and those exceptions that lead to a Form of Martial Law can be utilized with the Amendment that was signed in early January.

Bump to what scurge says!

Here we go rustling the feathers of the conspiracy theorists.

Didn't Americans engage in war in the year of 1775 to liberate themselves from such authorities? Yep ... the American Revolutionary War! And now it seems we're starting to fall under the same rule by similar authorities? This time, it's gun control ... then what next? I'm sure at least one of our leaders can see the potential "failure" with this. Then again, I guess history repeats itself at some point in time.

ilegworldchamp says ...

 And to think that when I made my statements about the President signing the  Amendment to the Interpol ability to ARREST , SEIZE , AND NOT REPORT OR BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE TO THE CONSTITUTION , it was met with "interpol has no Police or Police Authority". Well yes it does in out own ranks we have "INTERPOL OFFICERS" that are Local , State , and Federal and those exceptions that lead to a Form of Martial Law can be utilized with the Amendment that was signed in early January.

Though your statement is half correct.  Maybe you should read this:

Mark Leon Goldberg - December 23, 2009 - 5:29 pm

• Critic Watch


• Security

Last week, the Obama Administration issued an executive order that extended certain diplomatic privileges to Interpol--the International Criminal Police Organization.  This was a pretty innocuous bureaucratic move, but it has apparently sparked some serious concerns among a certain cadre of blogger.  For example, you have Steve Shippert and Clyde Middleton of ThreatsWatch worrying that this "could conceivably include...Americans arrested on our soil by INTERPOL officers."  And Andy McCarthy of National Review writes,

"This international police force...will be unrestrained by the U.S. Constitution and American law while it operates in the United States and affects both Americans and American interests outside the United States...Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies?"

Both McCarthy and the ThreatsWatch duo's understanding of how Interpol works seems to be heavily shaped by fiction and film. In real life,  Interpol is also not an "international police force."  This would imply that Interpol is composed of units of officers that can chase criminals across the world, Jason Bourne style.   In fact, there is no such thing as an "Interpol officer," as such.  Rather, law enforcement officers from Interpol's member states are seconded to the organization from national law enforcement agencies, like the FBI, U.S. Marshals, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, ect. 

This is not just a semantic distinction. Officers seconded to Interpol do not have any sort of transnational executive arrest power.   Rather, officers seconded to Interpol do things like coordinate busts of international child pornography rings.  The people actually making the arrests, though, are members of the national law enforcement of the country where the crimes are committed.  They are not "Interpol Officers" --  because there is no such thing as an "Interpol Officer."  Further, "Interpol" can't arrest an American on American soil, a Canadian on Canadian soil or a Rwandan on a Rwandan soil. Only national law enforcement can do that. 

As to the specific reaon why the Obama administration would decide, last week, to extend to Interpol the same suite of diplomatic privileges that are typically accorded to international organizations?  I don't have a good answer for that. My sense is that it probably has something to with the accessibility of Interpol's secure criminal databases (on things like stolen passports and the like).  But that is a question that could pretty easily be answered by a phone call to the Justice Department. 

I can say with authority that stoking concerns about Interpol whisking Americans away is un-informed fear mongering. 

*For the record, I worked at Interpol's Headquarters in Lyon France in 2002.

So fact check says Obama wants to look into banning imports and exports of weopons? It is unlikely that personal gun ownership could be outlawed in the U.S. in the way described in the thread. But, people should be wary of any gun laws proposed or any gun treaties proposed under this president or any other. He has a history of being anti-gun. I have heard speaches by BHO that state people don't have any reason to own guns. It's on the web. I will try to find it for reference if I have to. His voting record from what I have read and heard is also anti gun ownership. Regardless of what is fact or fiction, Americans should be on guard to protect the 2A because there are many out there that wish to disarm law abiding Americans by passing laws that really only hurt good people in order to gain or keep support of a misguided group or satisfiy a unrealistic expectation that could never stop criminals from harming others.

j_mrhoads says ...

taking away gun control isnt right and hopefully wont happen, all in all the polotics part of it is leading slowly but surely to end time prophesies of one world goverment, for anyone who is interested in that

1) Taking away gun control isn't right? Read that out loud to yourself.

2)polotics = Politics

3)porphesies = Prophecies

4)goverment = Government

5) Work on puncuation. Placement and usage, as well as capitalization.

Even if they said you can't carry a gun, would you stop? My life depends on mine. I'd carry it no matter what. I'd think everyone would do the same.

This is not a conspiracy theory.  It is FACT!  So what are we going to do about it?  Just complaining will get us no where.  What are you going to do about it???

More importantly, EVERYONE needs to be on a letter writing campaign to all of your senators, congressmen & women and governors out there, letting them know just how you feel on this subject.  Take a stand for you rights and beliefs......

I was at a while ago. I let my membership lapse when I got tired of being called every other week to get money out of me. I was going through a hard time in my life. The ex left me and I was broke. I literally had no money. That did not stop the calls. I explained I had no money I would if I could but I had NO $$. Their response, Sorry to hear that about a smalled donation then?

Kind of soured me on the NRA.

Thats a fact but I tend to hold a grudge for awhile.  I been tossing around renewing my membership now that I am not flat broke anymore.  I just dread the calls if I do.

ShockUSMC87 says ...

Its a chain email that was started as a prank. The treaty isnt true and they are just trying to rowl people up.

My god people....if they started a chain email that the world was gonna end tomorrow people would believe and freak.

Relax and live a little.......

Haven't you heard its suppose to end 12/21/2012 according to the mayan calendar