Law Enforcement Specialties >> Corrections, Probation & Parole >> DO YOU THINK THE LETHAL INJECTION IS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL?
DO YOU THINK THE LETHAL INJECTION IS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL?
122 posts back to top |
Posted over 5 years ago I know what my opinion is about this, but curious about what law enforcement thinks. All I will say is, the victims did not have the rights the offender has and I can't believe this has actually become a topic in the courts. |
860 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago NO |
6467 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago UHHHH NO It is a waste of money a 38 cent bullet to the back of the head is quicker and cost less... For so long as one hundred men remain alive, we shall never under any conditions submit to the domination of the English. It is not for glory or riches or honours that we fight, but only for liberty, which no good man will consent to lose but with his life. The Declaration of Arbroath, 1320 SCREW TIBET FREE SCOTLAND !!!! |
|
Anonymous 
-1289 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago bad_LT said: Yeah what bad-_LT said |
3423 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago bad_LT said: COULD NOT AGREE ANY MORE .....very well said! MODERATOR #7 |
|
6467 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago A line for a TV show (forget what one)........ ""What we need to do is take them outside tell them we made a hugh mistake you are being released in the morning, just as the smiles appears on their face, you shoot them in the back of the head....... There is nothing cruel to that person and they died with a happy thought, and never saw it coming. That is the only way for it not to be cruel....""" I will remember the TV show sooner or later and will come back and post it.. For so long as one hundred men remain alive, we shall never under any conditions submit to the domination of the English. It is not for glory or riches or honours that we fight, but only for liberty, which no good man will consent to lose but with his life. The Declaration of Arbroath, 1320 SCREW TIBET FREE SCOTLAND !!!! |
25 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago Preach it LT! |
|
Anonymous
-1053 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago We waste more money housing these A-holes and we have to babysit them and feed them and take care of all thier little illness but noone seems to care about the victems and the famlies of the people they hurt and don't give a damn about.....You sit there and listen to these a-holes as they brag with others like them as if it's a great club or something.....But them back into the gas chambers and chairs .....were tyhey kind and gentle to thier victems????? I know Mo. still has the 2 seater gas chamber....Love to see these scum of life be put right back in and watch them start to realize the life they hold so precious for themselfs is taken away like the life they had in thier hands they took away........ |
288 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago bad_LT said: i agree with you LT! all i want to know is how would the families think if they knew the person who killed their loved one was still alive with food in their stomache and a roof over their heads? |
|
860 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago we need to bring back public hangings |
262 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago I totally agree with the death penalty. I do not agree with lethal injection as a method. I think anyone who has seen the nick Berg video having his head sawed off, not cut off or decaptitated, would be a preferred method, but thats just me. Second, what I know about electricity, it travels and not much energy is lost so what it costs to fry one, might as well do a hundred. Just my idea. Oh, and Bad_Lt, great idea for the bullet. Can recover it, melt it down, and use it again, saving even more money!!! LOL |
348 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago I like options..Give them option a) suffer the same courtsey they gave their victim. or option b) public hanging. But thats me, Im just a nice guy. I think lethal injection is way to nice. |
|
6467 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago I had an idea a few years back........ Public stonings..... but for profit, see you pay 10 buck to be there, then it is 5 dollars per rock....... Sounded good at the time.... For so long as one hundred men remain alive, we shall never under any conditions submit to the domination of the English. It is not for glory or riches or honours that we fight, but only for liberty, which no good man will consent to lose but with his life. The Declaration of Arbroath, 1320 SCREW TIBET FREE SCOTLAND !!!! |
83 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago Nope, nothing cruel and unusual about it at all. The only thing I have a problem with is that they use sterile equipment to do it. Honestly, what's the point? |
178 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago No! I think we are being way to easy on them now. |
3800 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago I don't think that a person should have a right to appeal how they die, once convicted? The case on the hill right now, is a Kentucky case where the killer killed a Sheriff and his deputy 20 years ago. Why can't it be when you are sentenced to death they don't take you out side and put a bullet in your head. You die right then, and don't have to worry about feeling a little pain. 20 years is too long to wait to die! I love each day like its my last! Why do we are have to be so serious? |
|
178 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago Great idea LT |
|
948 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago LT our website executioner! damn good! |
|
Anonymous
-1868 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago bad_LT said: Dude! Now Thats Justice, cost effecient, and I think the victims family should get the first 10 rocks for free as well as having the opportunity to throw those 10 rocks first! You know, a little bit of pay back. |
527 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago No I don't I think that we should let the victim's family have them now that would cost $0 |
|
3423 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago i think the punishment should fit the crime but mostly be up to the family. if you cut someones head off, then the survivors of the victim should determine how your head is cut off. as they use to say....an eye for an eye!! MODERATOR #7 |
44 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago bad_LT said: That's exactly it! Right to the point! |
329 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago bad_LT said: i agree, you could also create jobs, someone has to clean up the mess, and make the bullets |
335 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago We need more of them, regardless of what method is use |
|
6467 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago K9COP2911 said: Other inmates clean up the mess and load the ammo....... If they do a light load then they are shot next regardless of their orginal conviction. For so long as one hundred men remain alive, we shall never under any conditions submit to the domination of the English. It is not for glory or riches or honours that we fight, but only for liberty, which no good man will consent to lose but with his life. The Declaration of Arbroath, 1320 SCREW TIBET FREE SCOTLAND !!!! |
82 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago NO===My only issue is thatit takes so long to get it done!!!! Too many opportunities for appeal after appeal!!! |
5417 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago CHIEF601 said: Thanks for the easy font size, there Chief ... EDITOR / ADMINISTRATOR
Honoring the Fallen |
882 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago bad_LT said: I agree completely But I think it's cruel and unusual that we all have to pay for their nice private cell. Stack 'em in! If they hurt each other, we' can save the 38 cents. |
395 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago bad_LT said: Agreed Keep the change I don't want it. False hope and lose change. |
1365 posts back to top |
| Posted over 5 years ago bad_LT said: Agreed
"Indecision may or may not be my problem." ~ Jimmy Buffett |
