Group Forums >> Law Enforcement History >> "PEELERS"

Rate

"PEELERS"

119 Views
7 Replies Flag as inappropriate
Fallenherobadge-3-1_max160_max50

450 posts

back to top

Posted 10 months ago

 

Anyone know where "PEELERS" came from? Give it a go.

Membootsbyrhilton-1_max160_max50

4086 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 10 months ago

 

Sir Robert Peel. They were his officers


In honor of 58,044 brothers who never returned from Viet Nam
http://www.1stsfss.org/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=404&dateline=1210000794

Bullitt_max50

4646 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 10 months ago

 

I am going with rickm on this one without Googling it first.  Probably around the first time LEO's were called 'coppers'.


FORUMS ADMINISTRATOR
Photobucket

Honoring the Fallen

Isabel2003_max50

95 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 10 months ago

 

I go with Sir Robert Peel...see the posting below, from this group nine months ago:


 


Sir Robert Peel, The Founder of Modern Policing


Sir Robert Peel is probably the most influential name associated with modern day policing. In 1829, he created the Metropolitan Police of London when he served as Home Secretary of England. The “Peelers,” or “Bobbies,” set precedent for what our police of today model themselves after.


When Peel created a metropolitan police department, he set up guidelines for them, which are called Peel’s Principles of Law Enforcement. These nine principles set up what he envisioned the metropolitan police to stand for. He wanted the police to stand by these principles and mold themselves to the conformity of the nine principles. One-hundred-seventy-nine years later, these principles still hold true today (MY INTERPREPATIONS FOLLOW EACH PRINCIPLE).


SIR ROBERT PEEL'S NINE PRINCIPLES

• The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder. (PROTECT AND SERVE)

• The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon public approval of police actions. (COMMUNITY POLICING)

• Police must secure the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observance of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public. (HOT TIPS, 911 AND CRIME SOLVERS)

• The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force. (EXCESSIVE FORCE CAUSES DISTRUST)

• Police seek and preserve public favour not by catering to public opinion but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law. (LAW APPLIES TO ALL)

• Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient. (RESPECT AND PERSUAIONS BEFORE FORCE)

• Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence. (EVERYONE IS INVOLVED IN KEEPING THE COMMUNITY SAFE)

• Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary. (CAPTURE CRIMINALS DO NOT PUNISH THEM)

• The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.

Still_have_it_max50

222 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 6 months ago

 

Sir Robert Peel is correct.   And they looked kind of strange.  From the drawings I have seen of the Peelers.  They had top hats and high collar long coats.  But that was the style back then. 

Sgt

212 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 6 months ago

 

Sir Robert Peel is  correct...

Presidentmonkey_max50

4816 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 6 months ago

 

Debate about the creation of a standing police force in England raged during the early part of the 19th century. Confronted with political objections and fears of potential abuse Robert Peel (later Sir Robert Peel) sponsored the first successful bill creating a bureaucratic police force in England.


In 1829 Peel's Metropolitan Police Act was passed by Wellington's government as a political compromise, the Act applying only to London. The jurisdiction of the legislation was limited to the Metropolitan London area, excluding the City of London and provinces.



  • All London's police were the responsibility of one authority, under the direction of the Home Secretary, with headquarters at Scotland Yard.

  • 1,000 men were recruited to supplement the existing 400 police.

  • Being a policeman became a full-time occupation with weekly pay of 16/- and a uniform.

  • Recruits were carefully selected and trained by the Commissioners.

  • Funds came from a special Parish Rate levied by the overseers of the poor.

  • Police were responsible only for the detection and prevention of crime.


Crime and disorder were to be controlled by preventive patrols and no stipends were permitted for successful solutions of crimes or the recovery of stolen property. Crime prevention was not the only business of the new police force: they inherited many functions of the watchmen such as



  • lighting lamplights

  • calling out the time

  • watching for fires

  • providing other public services


"Bobbies" or "Peelers" were not immediately popular. Most citizens viewed constables as an infringement on English social and political life, and people often jeered the police. The preventive tactics of the early Metropolitan police were successful, and crime and disorder declined. Their pitched battles with (and ultimate street victory over) the Chartists in Birmingham and London proved the ability of the police to deal with major disorders and street riots. Despite the early successes of the Metropolitan police, the expansion of police forces to rural areas was gradual. The Municipal Corporations Act of 1835 ordered all incorporated boroughs to set up police forces under the control of a watch committee, but it was not until 1856 that Parliament mandated that provinces establish police forces.


The Metropolitan Police Act established the principles that shaped modern English policing. First, the primary means of policing was conspicuous patrolling by uniformed police officers. Second, command and control were to be maintained through a centralised, pseudo-military organisational structure. The first Commissioners were Charles Rowan (an ex-Colonel) and Richard Mayne (a Barrister). They insisted that the prevention of crime was the first object of the police force. Third, police were to be patient, impersonal, and professional. Finally, the authority of the English constable derived from three official sources-the crown, the law, and the consent and co-operation of the citizenry.


It has been suggested that as London's crime-rate fell, that of nearby areas increased. The number of offences did seem to increase in areas of London where the police were not allowed to go: Wandsworth became known as "black" Wandsworth because of the number of criminals who lived there. As the 1839 Royal Commission pointed out:


Criminals migrate from town to town, and from the towns where they harbour, and where there are distinct houses maintained for their accommodation, they issue forth and commit depredations upon the surrounding rural districts; the metropolis being the chief centre from which they migrate


The 1835 Municipal Corporations Act helped older boroughs to sort out their administrative structure and allowed new towns to become incorporated. Towns which were incorporated were obliged to set up their own police force but few of them seemed eager to implement the law:



  • 1837: 93 of 171 boroughs had organised a police force.

  • 1840: 108 of 171 boroughs had organised a police force.

  • 1848: 22 boroughs still had no police force.


Municipal forces were about half the size of London, proportionate to population. Most boroughs were slow to take advantage of the 1835 Act and remained grossly inadequate until after 1856.


Police statistics




Town




Year




1 policeman per






London




1830




450- 500 inhabitants






Liverpool




1841




460 inhabitants






Manchester




1841




610 inhabitants






Birmingham




1841




840 inhabitants






London




1841




900 inhabitants






11 provincial boroughs




1841




940-1500 inhabitants






6 provincial boroughs




1841




1500 inhabitants




The 1839 Rural Constabulary Act, which came as a direct result of the Royal Commission on Constabulary Forces of the same year, caused some boroughs to panic and to reorganise their own police forces to avoid the high expense of being involved with county forces. The Act did not meet the Report's demands for a national police force, with the Metropolitan Police as the controlling power. The Act permitted JPs to appoint Chief Constables for the direction of the police in their areas and allowed for one policeman per 1,000 population. Response was poor. By 1853 only 22 counties of 52 had police forces. Yorkshire was the poorest served. One division of the East Riding had only 9 policemen. By about 1855 there were only 12,000 policemen in England and Wales.


The provinces were slow to implement the 1839 Act because



  • Edwin Chadwick, one of the members of the Commission, saw the new police as a means of executing the new Poor Law, which was unpopular

  • there was opposition to the idea of police, as a challenge to the liberties of England.

  • the expense was deemed to be too great

  • local government inertia

  • difficulty in getting advice from London

  • the lack of co-operation between the boroughs and the counties

  • no provision was made until 1856 for government inspection, audit or regulation


"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr

Retleo (MODERATOR #8)