Gear: Beretta M9


Beretta M9

Category: Firearms, Tasers & Accessories
Subcategory: Handguns
Price: $601.00
Average Rating:
(75 Votes)

High capacity weapon and fixed sights. This is one accurate little handgun

Member Reviews

  • Pitman_photo_-_06_april__06_max30
    usafsp12, Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:14:35 UTC.
    1st review

    The high capacity and accuracy make this a great weapon for duty carry. Unfortunately, the downfall is smaller caliber and no tactical rail assembly to mount a tac light to. I still love the weapon, don't get me wrong. I use it for duty as well as concealed carry on occasions. You can't go very wrong with this weapon.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Baiky_i_max30
    sfcren, Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:03:37 UTC.

    The double action trigger pull requires a lot of pull compared to the single action, thus your first shot you must take some time, or pull the hammer back before firing. I have qualified expert on the M-4 but never on the M-9 and probably never will, we only shoot twice a year on this weapon in the Air Force.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • H2510_max30
    hobertj, Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:31:23 UTC.

    I enjoy shooting the M9 Beretta. One of the few pistols that I can attain a "natural" grip with. Definately not for the small handed shooter, though. I've yet to come across any major malfunctions. Easy cleaning and maintenance. Just wish the government would go to the .40 and not the 9mm.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Hansinthesnow_max30
    RedWhiteAndBlue, Fri, 03 Aug 2007 20:54:48 UTC.

    This is the gun I carry on the job. It has served me well although the mostly retired military civilian police officers (DOD) I work with seem to prefer the glock.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • 82nd_airborne_max30
    BLACKMAN, Tue, 07 Aug 2007 23:22:05 UTC.

    OKAY WEAPON Our AGENCY Is Going To The PX-STORM. As a Certified FI in my opinion I would have Chosen the SIG DAK or SIG 228 or the HK USP all in .40cal.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Jimbo_max30
    captain76america, Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:03:55 UTC.

    Where's my 1911? Not a great gun, not really any stopping power in this, and it just doesn't feel right, maybe it's just me. But I do know that this was my dads favorite weapon he shot back in his day in the military and Law Enforcement.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Jal_fast_main_image_max30
    Midnite_Mikey, Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:24:25 UTC.

    This was the issue duty gun I carried in a specially modified version, an agency REQUIRED / FACTORY modification. The pistol had a magazine disconnect safety created...(with pros & cons to that particular feature). High cap, with nite sights... hard to go wrong... the detractors say the 9mm is not a fight stopper.... this is true but it's lethal ability is also proven...

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Sober_kids_max30
    DD78, Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:53:58 UTC.

    Is it minimally acceptable...sure. But there are a ton of firearms out there that outclass it from bullet size to control to cycling to EVERYTHING. The manual safety can cost you precious seconds. It can take 15 in the mag but I'd rather have 12 .40's over 15 9mm's. The one aspect where this firearm is superior is ease of takedown. You can field strip it in seconds with minimal training.

    Other than that...go get a Sig.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Img_7213bcb_max30
    usk9af, Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:29:29 UTC.

    Good 'Ol Military Special. In all honesty not a bad pistol with good accuracy.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • P1000261_max30
    larkinforce, Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:25:17 UTC.

    Good weapon if you like 9mm. Never had a problem with one. Very accurate.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Bdulrge7old_max30
    USAFE7, Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:48:08 UTC.

    I have gotten used to this weapon. It does require practice to make sure your accuracy is spot on. I would not turn it down in a fight, but would rather have my XD in .40 or .45.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Asdasd_max30
    Simmons_136, Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:58:09 UTC.

    I wish the Army used something the 1911 or XD.....the grip is too big for my hands....and just dosent feel good.......9mm....when you shoot someone it just ticks them off....espcially with the military ammo

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Photo_user_blank_big
    bhuynh, Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:29:59 UTC.

    great weapon, very accurate, reliable easy to clean, easy takedown, open chamber for easy visual inspection, too bad this model didn't come with rails for expansion or mods

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Photo_user_banned_big
    DGM, Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:21:36 UTC.

    No, No, and NO..
    After witnessing a slide separation and having to administer First Aid at the shooting range, I will NEVER carry this, even if it means not working for a department. I will never bet my life on it, and I would never bet my life on a 9x19 anyways. At least my local agency carries the G31 in .357SiG, but I still hate Glocks as well.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Robertmitchum_max30
    bad_LT, Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:33:35 UTC.

    A lot of people do not like this weapon, but it has served me well since 1991.....

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Photo_user_banned_big
    zipper, Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:13:51 UTC.

    If you shot someone with this and they found out they would be very angry with you. In my opinon if you threw this at someone it would have more sotpping power.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Cot_max30
    hbg522, Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:24:06 UTC.

    sorry but i have fired a few of these and not impressed at all. the trigger pull seems too heavy and just an awkward handgun.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Newhk_max30
    jcsaathoff, Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:22:35 UTC.

    Ok weapon never really had any problems.. the caliber is less than desirable..

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Larbn_max600_max30
    okc_marine, Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:07:09 UTC.

    love this weapon. great peice of gear. im going to be getting the M90-2 soon. same model just modified a smiggin.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • 3fffbb1-1_max30
    Deputycw4, Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:17:16 UTC.

    Great weapon for just plinking around with but the caliber leaves much to be desired and during a tactical training exercise several year ago an instructor showed an officer that was caring one what happens in a close quarter fight with some one who knew how to take the slide away from him and potentially use it as a blunt instrument. Not no But Hell no as a duty weapon for me.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Nyspcharger1st6_max30
    MSherman7, Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:19:19 UTC.

    POS weapon! I wouldn't even stop a squirrel. I don't understand why they are still used and issued in the Army!

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Badge2_max30
    istu58448, Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:40:22 UTC.

    I hate this weapon... Always had problems with jamming. I perfer 1911, better weapon for overall mission. In Afgan. I had issues with it constantly jamming, and I cleaned it regularly.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Photo_user_blank_big
    jimreamey, Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:52:02 UTC.

    Over priced junk! Should be named the jam o matic! Have been a range instructor for overs 20 yrs years, have seen more problems with this weapon than all others combined!

    Flag as inappropriate
  • In_remembrance_max30
    thebig_d_58, Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:13:44 UTC.

    i dont like this gun at all. its over priced, the trigger pull is WAY too heavy, and its all metal so its considerably heavier than it needs to be. i will NEVER recommend this gun, not even to my worst enemy

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Thin_blue_line_max30
    michaelgray84, Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:49:24 UTC.

    I hated carrying this weapon all of the 5 years I was in the Army. The trigger is too heavy, it's a small caliber. I can put tons of rounds right down the middle with just about 99% of the pistols I have ever shot, the Beretta M9 is one of the 1% that just doesn't work.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Thin_blue_line_max30
    bbb, Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:06:23 UTC.

    You’re better off just beating someone over the head with this because that will at least cause some damage. With only a 9mm round you need to unload your entire magazine into someone before they fall, and if they are on any kind of drug forget about it, you’re screwed. Also, the gun feels so awkward in my hands, and for a 9mm the trigger pull is just to much. Not worth the money, you could definitely get a lot better gun for just as much, if not cheaper. I’d go with the Springfield XD .45 myself, but that’s just me.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Afosi_mourning_badge_max30
    david_j9, Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:45:21 UTC.

    An OK handgun...carried it for many years and became a very proficient reflexive-tactical shooter with it.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Gizmo_max30
    Maguai, Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:56:25 UTC.

    Geez... I have a 92g... I have a small hand and I shoot expertly. I've never had trouble shooting anything I fired though. I carried the M9 in the service, so when I went to civilian LE, it seemed like the easiest thing to do. I've heard plenty of arguments for stopping power... I've sem an H&K 45 shot to the sternum that didn't penetrate... soooo.. never over estimate the ability of any gun or yourself. I like my 92 g better.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Red_drum_max30
    LAW105, Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:50:19 UTC.


    Flag as inappropriate
  • Hugo_max30
    MPFerrigno, Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:13:28 UTC.

    This is the weapon of choice for the US military and let me tell you, its garbage. If you get a little dirt or sand in it its done, great feature for those in the desert...

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Img_1912_max30
    AOrozco, Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:36:46 UTC.

    I carried it when I was in the Military it NEVER did me wrong I was dead on target with it. Not a bad handgun.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Cross_max165_max30
    ScottBurke, Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:40:25 UTC.

    Ok firearm one good thing is the high capacity.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Sd530041_max30
    jbushnell, Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:24:20 UTC.

    It is an alright weapon, after carrying one as an MP for 7+ years I realized it cant compete with Glock or Smith & Wesson M&P series. I am really looking forward to shooting the new Beretta Ninety-Two.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Mandalorian_crest_max30
    wolfghost35m, Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:56:00 UTC.

    SUCKS!!!! in the 11 years that ive been in the service, never liked it. Its good for keeping the bad guys head down, thats about it. Oh and making Noob JO's feel safe

    Flag as inappropriate
  • 100_1304_max30
    K9_SFS, Tue, 06 May 2008 23:48:11 UTC.

    Alot of people hate this weapone due to its size and weight. I have been carrying this for almost 6 years now in the military whether it be here at home on the LE side or deployed as a secondary weapon. I fire accurate as hell with this weapon and it has never let me down. Of course there is always something better but I know it will fire and hardly jam on me! 5 stars for me

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Pict0025_max30
    davism29, Wed, 07 May 2008 01:10:11 UTC.

    Hate it. Too heavy for 9mm. Also expensive, i'd pay $300 for it but not more. Hpwever, choice between SA and DA is a plus.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • 1126071119_max30
    Hoffa_45, Wed, 07 May 2008 04:50:55 UTC.

    ok gun. to heavy. round to lite in the azz. give me my GLOCK, or even a SIG...

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Deptofarmypolicedui_max30
    MPAaronT, Sun, 11 May 2008 22:28:01 UTC.

    I have been using the M9 for about 9 years now, I have found it to be a very easy weapon to fire, and it is very accurate. The M9 is easy to maintain and is extremely durable. The only downfall is that its smaller caliber has little stopping power however; in the hands of a skilled marksman, it does a fantastic job.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Tl_eastwood_max30
    TLEastwood, Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:40:12 UTC.

    Only problem I have with this one is my hands are small - I can handle it to shoot, but it's not my first choice for a conceal carry.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Tony_a_max30
    tlacks, Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:39:46 UTC.

    I have carried a 92FS - same as the M9 - for 10 years. No jams. feels good in the hand and point very naturally. I really LIKE thise firearm.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Th_a11845d-lg-b_max30
    NiteWolf, Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:08:53 UTC.

    I feel its a good weapon to start with. The only problem that I have seen with it is the weapon is a large frame and is hard to fire with small hands. But if you have normal size hands fire away.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Hpim2780_max30
    NuclearTrainer, Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:35:08 UTC.

    This is a very good weapon, just like any weapon it has its pros and cons. I have been using this weapon for 12 years and never have I had any malfunction with the gun. I have seen some malfunctions with the weapon, all of them were shooter induced with the exception of one. the locking block cracked.

    Some cons of the weapon could be: If you are small handed it will not work well due to its big hand grips, The first double action for some is hard to pull (you need to work on your hand strength) and there is not much room for additions to the weapon.

    Some Pros: The single action, yes the first double action might be tough for some, but you can not beat the single action on every round fired after the first round. Safety; it has serveral safety features, such as the safety/deckoing lever and the firing pin block.

    This is a weapon that needs to grow on you. It is not the fancy type and like others said, it is only a 9mm.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Photo_user_blank_big
    Anonymous, Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:47:48 UTC.

    Excellent weapon. I dropped one off of a shelf (on accident) once and it stood strong! No problems with it ever.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Photo_user_blank_big
    Ukeduke, Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:01:45 UTC.

    Accurate as hell, but still best applied as a blunt instrument to the temple as opposed to actually firing it, or alternatively, leaving it in your foot locker in favor of a nice .45 or even .40 that'll get the job done. And, yeah, I KNOW the slide trick! (heh...) Anyone training Krav Maga will eventually learn it too as a fun joke even if for no other use. We train with the blank-only theatrical model in simulated "live-fire" exercises and the "slip-n-slide" as we call it has become a sort of comedy relief maneuver in the gym. Funny to see two armed combatants in a simulated CQ encounter both try for the move at the same time then have to disengage because they're both laughing too hard to continue.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Work_c_max30
    farrellsm77, Sat, 16 Aug 2008 20:00:42 UTC.

    I carried one of these while I was in the US Navy and I hated it... I did not like the M9 at all. I was big and 9mm. I love my Glock .40's so much better.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • 1213497874630546901_max30
    Moriarti, Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:32:44 UTC.

    I have carried one for 19 years. Have seen malfunctions and breakages over the years - most due to rubbish ammo or magazines - a few were locking block failures due to eleventy gazillion rounds fired with no overhaul. The beretta is a fine handgun and its main problem is military ammo - MILBALL sux in every way. Further the issue (non-beretta) mags are rubbish. For duty carry where a manual safety is required, it really is first class. That being said - off duty I carry a GLock 29 in 10mm.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Obi_wan_max30
    Santino, Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:33:38 UTC.

    I have used this gun on duty for over six years and I've broken the Locking Block on about 4 of them and the safety switch on two of them. It is an accurate gun this is true however it is too heavy and outdated I recommend any Glock product over this model.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • 14_max30
    brotheriblue, Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:22:20 UTC.

    I use the civilian version 92brigadierFS the problem I see with it is you have to use 124grain round 115grain tends to jam but overall is an exeptionally proficient weapon. I love mine

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Karens_face_max30
    kt25232, Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:25:29 UTC.

    This lil beauty came through for me when I needed it most, thank God!

    Flag as inappropriate
  • 20071024fat_030_max30
    miller8303, Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:27:39 UTC.

    I have carried the military issued weapon for around 6 or so years now. Honestly, out of the box they are decent starting weapons, but over time without real maintenance these weapons deteriorate quickly. The military doesn't always spend the money on repair or constant maintenance of their weapons like they should. This is where most service members get their bad experiences from. They have been issued a weapon that has been mishandled by some idiot over the past 3 years and the guy before him didn't take care of it either. Now it's the next guys problem when it jams or fails. I have seen many malfunctions, but I'll be honest, it's usually caused by military issued ammo or issued (non-beretta) magazinse with weak springs and defects inside the mag. Would I buy one for my personal carry, no, especially not in 9mm. I commonly carry no less than .40 or a 357. I am actually looking to get back into revolvers as personal carry. For a new owner and user, this is actually a great weapon as long as your hands are big enough to make it around the grips.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Dscn4699_max30
    KFJames71, Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:35:46 UTC.

    I have carried this weapon for 17 years and it is reliable and accurate. It fits large hands well and is extremely easy to take down. I would prefer a larger caliber and have heard that after X amount of rounds the slide system can fail and cause injury. I personally have not witnessed this failure, although the AF CATM personnel provide good maintenance to our weapons.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Photo_user_blank_big
    obx_lifeguard, Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:32:26 UTC.

    30 yrs in the Army I carried a variety of weapons. As a pilot sidearms were the norm.

    In Viet Nam I carried the renowned 1911... and it was a piece of junk. Barrel was shot out and it rattled even in the holster. I have a Colt Gold Cup and a Kimber .45 that are fine weapons but my issued 1911 was a POS. I carried 'acquired' M2 carbines, M3 SMGs or AKs for combat.

    Next was S&W Model 10 .38 revolvers. Scores went up modestly in qualifications and most pilots and crew-chiefs were moderately competent whereas only us 'gun nuts' had been competent with the 1911's.

    The M9 was heralded with such bad press (mostly from the 1911 zealots) that I disliked it before I'd ever held one. I was sure my Sig 226(9mm) or 220(.45) were far superior weapons in every respect. I was in for a pleasant surprise. The M9 was a very easy pistol to shoot well. Qualification scores went up significantly throughout my battalion. As far as being an all around combat pistol I think it is excellent. As far as significantly better stopping power is concerned, the only sure one shot stopper in my experience comes down the barrel of a Ma Deuce... and no one's carrying one of those on their hip.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Trying_again_max30
    Potter_MP, Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:22:20 UTC.

    In my opinion the M9 does what it is supposed to do. I pack one here in Iraq. We "draw" smiley faces and anatomy parts on targets during qulaification. If I need serious stopping power I have a M249 light machinegun and a M2 on my HMMWV. Cant say it better than he did..
    *As far as significantly better stopping power is concerned, the only sure one shot stopper in my experience comes down the barrel of a Ma Deuce... and no one's carrying one of those on their hip.*

    Flag as inappropriate
  • 100_0325_max30
    ArmyMP, Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:40:49 UTC.

    I hate this thing, it is a piss-poor caliber and it sucks up so much dust in the desert that you would think it was a vacuum cleaner. If I had my choice, I would never wear one again.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • In_remembrance_of_oakland_pd_max50_max50_max50_max50_max30
    Justin2421, Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:51:58 UTC.

    This is my first handgun, while it shoots smooth and rarely jams, the grip is quite large and uncomfortable. Overall this is not a bad gunl.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Photo_user_blank_big
    AFK9Justice, Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:31:55 UTC.

    Overall a good weapon.

    Fit: My hands hold the grip well with ease of reach to the trigger. However, even with my long fingers the decocking level can be a pain to reach without moving the hands on the grip.

    Weight: Easy on the arms even during extended periods of keeping the weapon out of holster. I have had to hold onto my weapon for more than hour in a low ready(ish) position and I didn't think it would be any more heavy than other guns for that time period.

    Power: With the NATO ball round, this weapon sucks. No other words can discribe just how poor this weapon is at stopping the target. The high velocity is great if you need to punch through light metal but horrible in a one on one interface. When I shot my targets I could literally watch the rounds exit out the back and impact whatever was behind them. The targets continued with very little slow down. If it wasn't for good shot placement, the targets would never have dropped. I venture to think if it was a hollow point the same wouldn't probably have happened as there would have been some stopping power and cause more internal trauma.

    Otherwise, I like this weapon but I will always prefer my Glock 22 (.40S&W).

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Uniform-at_ease1_max30
    GM3Flash, Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:00:45 UTC.

    Easy enough to handle and the ambidextrous thumb safety is handy, but stove pipes often, the locking block is fragile, and it doesn't really have the stopping power when you absolutely need it.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Photo_user_blank_big
    Anonymous, Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:34:19 UTC.

    I don't care much for it. I was pissed when they took the 1911 away. I wondered why the 1st MARDIV general staff at that time still had the .45's. The trigger pull is too long for me. The "slip and slide" feature turns me off too. Accurate enough for its purpose. Better than "giving 'em the bird".

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Policelinkbadge_max160_1__max160_max30
    Caveman6240, Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:00:53 UTC.

    This is a pretty decent weapon. The only thing that sucks is that it builds up a lot of carbon....then could just be the cheap rounds the Army uses......Damn the cheap ass Army!!!!!

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Wpns_table_max30
    Bulldog136, Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:37:59 UTC.

    I know that Beretta offers .40 and .45 but this says M9 so I'm only giving four stars because it is a 9mm. Carried an M9 in combat twice and never had any malfunctions, just needs more knock down.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Photo_user_banned_big
    impoundguy, Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:39:56 UTC.

    I carry one....and would not go to Glock even though my Department is going to them now as standard's a great piece in my opinion. A well placed Baretta 9mm is just as effective as a Glock 9mm, 40 cal or 45 cal. It is not the size but the placement of that hollow point round that counts.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • E_2011_max30
    OFCR3627, Sat, 02 May 2009 14:20:44 UTC.

    Love it own it carry it!

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Product_thumb_max30
    jasonrose, Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:11:48 UTC.

    I shot a 30 out of 30 at camp perry didn't miss a shot. The hand grip is a little big also hit five targets with four bullets thanks to a ricashay

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Dscn044c7-1_max30
    stoneveilx, Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:44:53 UTC.

    Yeah to be honest, I really did not like how this gun felt and fit my hand...not a fan.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Photo_user_blank_big
    Anonymous, Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:30:48 UTC.

    This was a big mistake for the military to pick up. It was a quick fix to get rid of the 38's that we use to have. I hate it for the simple fact that it is way too heavy, and the round is too small. With all the spec ops that is out there using the 45acp i see no need for us cops to have this gun in out inventory. We should go back to the 1911.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Cope_ad_max30
    wmhutchison, Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:54:58 UTC.

    Carrier on for thirteen years. Never a malfunction, not picky about ammo, and always accurate.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Woods_max30
    Uncon214, Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:25:56 UTC.

    Military guys knock this weapon. No stopping power. As a US Marine, I'm in the same boat guys/gals. But newsflash... Even with hardball... This is an extremely reliable weapon, given good magazines. And very Accurate... What does that equal? 9mm Hardball gives this thing the no stopping power issue. But I guarantee you if you put that 9mm hardball in the head or heart.... Mr. Taliban will leave you the f**k alone! And he'll do it with a quickness at that.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Our_wedding_003_max30
    Sgt_ProudPapa, Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:58:43 UTC.

    One particular day is stuck in my memory.Completely out of ammunition for my M16A4 leaving me with my "trusty" side arm. After 6 consecutive rounds low and behold JAM. As an insurgent approached charging in my direction I threw my "trusty" Beretta hitting the attacking insurgent and rendering him helpless and completely unconscious.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Copy_of_marine_photo_edited_edited_max30
    MarineMPSpecReac, Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:50:52 UTC.

    I think a lot of people look at the Berretta M9 with their minds made up simply because the pistol is 9MM. Some people wish that the military would go to a 40. But what they don't know is that our caliber choices for almost all small arms are NATO pact, meaning we all use the same caliber. NATO agreed overwhelming to the 9MM because it has a great balance of power and a capacity for a lot of rounds versus the 45 cal. Secondly, the Berretta got a bad rap when the Army field tested the M9 with super high pressure ammo that exceeded even +P+ ratings; this is why there where a lot of cracked slides and failure. I was a PMI (weapons instructor) on the M9 in the Marine Corps. Because the M9 is a military pistol that will go through the hands of several hundred thousand G.I.'s the military thought it would be prudent to request a higher than normal DA trigger pull to aid in reduced accidental discharges. That one can be placed on the military. Secondly the only thing most police officers want is a bigger caliber, get a 96FS in 40. But the gun is a superb high capacity accurate pistol. If you want kick use +P ammo in either 124gr or 147gr. 115gr. tend to not have the impact of hydro-static shock. As a police officer I carried this as my service pistol as a Marine MP I did the same. I love it and am well satisfied understanding why it is designed as it is. People just need to understand the gun in a proper context of its designers and gov't users.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • 20552_1343137337912_1215571721_31006460_5991340_n_max30
    TrafficCop28, Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:40:48 UTC.

    I absolutely love the feel of this weapon. It fits my hand like it was molded to it. The only things I can say are: 1. No railing for external light/laser combo. 2. 9mm. The stopping power of a .40 or .45 is way superior.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • 20937_326612226256_721676256_5080300_7611332_n_max30
    Duran_21, Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:20:33 UTC.

    I have a hard time even giving it one star...

    1. 9mm round is just not enough for me, sure it will work but I dont trust it.
    2. open slide, if we lived in a perfectly clean world this would not be a problem, however we dont... sand, dirt and water can be a problem.
    3. I personally did not like the feel of the weapon.

    The only reason i gave it one star is that it is a true shot, when it fires.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Untitled_max30
    Paul_AK, Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:07:30 UTC.

    While I have usually prefer a larger caliber, I have never experienced an issue with the functionality of this weapon.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Photo_user_blank_big
    Renderosity, Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:35:41 UTC.

    It's shit. There's a reason why the military buys from the lowest bidder for the regular service members, and provides Spec-Ops the good weapons.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Protect___serve_logo_max30
    TRPD758, Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:52:30 UTC.

    Not a fan at all of this weapon. We are in the process of phasing this out for our Emergency Response Unit. I don't like how this weapon disassembles either. Probably doesn't help that I am a Glock man. Also from my experience in dealing with this particular firearm, I have not been impressed in the long term durability. I think this firearm would make a great paperweight or you could use throw it in self defense.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Photo_user_blank_big
    rickysteamboat6, Sat, 13 Apr 2013 07:50:15 UTC.

    Good weapon as far as capacity and accuracy. Not so great for stopping power which I guess is why they give you 15 rounds. I have one at home to practice with since that is our issue weapon in the service, but I'll take a .45 or a .357 any day of the week.

    Flag as inappropriate