Sorry but this is going overboard a little bit. This 'teacher' is only 23 yrs old and quite attractive herself and single. The
'child' was a 17 yr old man and certainly was not mentally harmed by this. It was simply something that was rather improper. The young man if he is like 99% of young men at that age is a walking hormone himself.Sure, fire her as a teacher and even fine her for her behaviour but jail? Sorry, I don't see it as appropriate at all.
uncledennis1
over 1 year ago
22370 Comments
The problem I have if this had been a male teacher everyone would want his nads on a stick.
Robocop33
over 1 year ago
14380 Comments
Sorry but this is going overboard a little bit. This 'teacher' is only 23 yrs old and quite attractive herself and single. The
'child' was a 17 yr old man and certainly was not mentally harmed by this. It was simply something that was rather improper. The young man if he is like 99% of young men at that age is a walking hormone himself.Sure, fire her as a teacher and even fine her for her behaviour but jail? Sorry, I don't see it as appropriate at all.
FreezeP
over 1 year ago
1368 Comments
there wasn't teachers like this when i was in school. all my teachers just suspend me from school and give lots of home work.