Print

News >> Browse Articles >> Crime News

-84

Pedophile Legally Watches Child Porn In Jail

Pedophile Legally Watches Child Porn In Jail

Associated Press

July 19, 2011

SEATTLE — Authorities in Washington state say they’re outraged that a former pilot who’s already admitted molesting young boys is being allowed to watch videos he made of the abuse while he sits in jail awaiting trial.

“The whole thing is just dirty,” said Pierce County Sheriff’s Detective Ed Troyer on Wednesday. “Now that victims know he’s going to be watching this, they’re going to feel victimized again. This is our call to action to get the law changed.”

Washington’s Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that upon request, prosecutors must give defense lawyers copies of evidence used to support child pornography charges — but it appears nevertheless rare that defense attorneys actually make that request.

The court’s 8-1 decision said that granting copies of the materials was essential so that defense lawyers, their investigators and the defendants themselves could challenge the evidence — such as by arguing that the people depicted weren’t really minors.

The high court set out guidelines for handling the material, saying that it should only be shown to defendants under the supervision of counsel, that defense attorneys would be personally liable for any unauthorized distribution, and that the material had to be promptly returned to law enforcement once the case concluded.

But the former pilot, Marc Weldon Gilbert, is representing himself. The judge in his case has allowed him to view the materials at the jail, and issued a ruling this week clarifying how those materials should be handled for security reasons.

The judge barred him from being alone when he reviews the videos and other evidence, set out on more than 100 compact discs.

He reviews them in a room visible to corrections officers with a defense investigator present, Troyer said. The jail requires him to turn his computer screen away from any doors or windows so other inmates don’t see.


Gilbert used money, alcohol and manipulation to sexually exploit more than a dozen boys as young as 10 years old. He pleaded guilty in 2009 to federal charges, including sexual exploitation of a child, in exchange for a 25-year sentence. He still faces state charges in Pierce County.

Criminal defendants generally have a constitutional right to see the evidence against them so they can prepare for trial. That’s always been a sensitive issue in child pornography cases, where many people are troubled by the notion that perverts might be allowed to continue viewing the illicit material that got them in trouble in the first place.

“We have to disclose when we intend to introduce cocaine in a drug case, but we don’t give the defendant a kilo to take home and check out,” Pierce County Prosecutor Mark Lindquist said. “It is not necessary for the defendant to view the child porn himself to assist in his defense.”

Even though the state Supreme Court has explicitly clarified that defendants can view the child porn involved in their cases, it appears to be a rare occurrence. Lindquist said he knew of no other instance in Pierce County, and Dan Donohoe, spokesman for the King County prosecutor’s office in Seattle, said defense lawyers there typically review such evidence without their clients present.

Jack King, a spokesman for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, said that in most states, defense lawyers are typically required to come to a law enforcement office to review evidence in the case, rather than being given copies to review with defendants. He called that problematic.

“It’s very helpful in any kind of case to have a defendant go over the evidence with you,” he said. “The defendant can say, ‘That’s pure Photoshop,’ or ‘These are all adults.’”

But even some defense attorneys questioned the necessity of having the defendants review the porn personally. Tom Hillier, who heads the federal public defender’s office in Seattle, said that in federal cases, defendants are never allowed to review the material, and he didn’t see any reason why they should.

“We set up a discovery conference with a prosecutor,” he said. “You meet with an agent, do a viewing of however much you want to look at, and focus on things that might have an impact under the sentencing guidelines or on the case. If you have a question about authenticity or anything else, you can file a request to have independent examination by an expert. It’s done under fairly tight controls to be sure that the porn doesn’t get out of the control of the government.”


-84
  • shadow_officer

    over 2 years ago

    8560 Comments

    WTH

  • 1979_max50

    Robocop33

    over 2 years ago

    14600 Comments

    Sorry, I know the letter of the law says that this is legal but common sense tells you that he is simply getting his rocks off doing this. When are we good people going to stand up and just say no? Grow a pair and do what is right? Tell this perverted bastard that he is not going to watch another porno film, ever, and that he can either defend himself or not but the films are not going to be something that he will ever see again, period.

  • In_remembrance_of_oakland_pd_max50_max50_max50_max50_max50

    rhood

    over 2 years ago

    23592 Comments

    What the hell were they thinking when they made that decision. This degenerate lowlife needs to be placed in general population and let yard justice take it's course.

  • Anonymous-killer-whale-232189_1__max50

    Whalewatcher

    over 2 years ago

    10908 Comments

    Bump ajsdaddyCCSO !!!!

  • Image_max50

    Book_Em_Mandie

    over 2 years ago

    6748 Comments

    He found a way to get his rocks off while sitting behind bars, no kiddos in the pen.... Nasty SOB!

  • Sparkle_girl_max50

    Katz

    over 2 years ago

    8262 Comments

    Bump....... gcoleman! This is disgusting!

  • Herosonpatrol_max50

    BeachAngel

    over 2 years ago

    5668 Comments

    Disgraceful............

  • Car_004_max50

    copper380

    over 2 years ago

    2026 Comments

    I................uh..............well.................YEEEEEEEEAH! WHAT?

  • Me2_max50

    bstites

    over 2 years ago

    1028 Comments

    They should charge him every time he watches them.

  • Images_7a8ec2bec1e1bf7f38b54b52a8c9c453_max50

    gcoleman

    over 2 years ago

    2248 Comments

    Justice system reaches another level of stupid! wow

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    Anonymous

    over 2 years ago

    Its disgusting! Thats the whole reason he's in jail, and now he can have the items whenever he wants to "review them". I'm thinking giant loophole in the system?!

  • Me_last_wk_max50

    delano388

    over 2 years ago

    4318 Comments

    Thats messed up on so many levels.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    bashful0043

    over 2 years ago

    70 Comments

    This sick SOB needs to be put into general population and let the other take care of him!!!! To allow this is an abomination to the justice system!!!! Let the inmates have their way. It'll save the taxpayers tons of money!!!!

  • Joe_portrait_max50

    SgtJoe1350

    over 2 years ago

    24496 Comments

    ??? !!!!

  • Jack-sparrow-pirates-of-the-caribbean_max50

    Tetra021

    over 2 years ago

    492 Comments

    .....

PoliceLink School Finder

Save time in your search for a criminal justice degree program. Use PoliceLink's School Finder to locate schools online and in your area.

Get Info

* In the event that we cannot find a program from one of our partner schools that matches your specific area of interest, we may show schools with similar or unrelated programs.

Recent Activity

shadow_officer commented on: "Leaked Memo Uncovers Obama Administration Land Grab", less than a minute ago.
White_shirt_max30
uncledennis1 commented on: "Brighteyes63", about 2 hours ago.
2014-04-12_22
Brighteyes63 received a gift from uncledennis1, about 2 hours ago.
White_shirt_max30
uncledennis1 commented on: "Emily H", about 2 hours ago.
Img_20131002_173236_max30
enya94 received a gift from uncledennis1, about 2 hours ago.