Print

News >> Browse Articles >> Law Enforcement News

-17

San Jose Mayor Targeting Pensions in Budget

San Jose Mayor Targeting Pensions in Budget

San Jose Mercury News via YellowBrix

March 12, 2011

SAN JOSE- San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed said Friday the city cannot afford to pare its work force any further to close chronic budget deficits.

But with a 10th straight year of red ink raising the specter of massive cuts to everything from police to libraries, avoiding more layoffs will require hefty reductions to current and future employee pensions and perks, Reed said in budget recommendations released Friday.

The City Council will consider the recommendations Tuesday and vote on them the following week.

“It is a big sell,” Reed acknowledged. “The level of service we have today is the minimum. We’ve cut and cut and cut for nine years, and we have to do things to preserve services to the community, and there aren’t other ways to do it.”

The council can modify Reed’s recommendations, which provide policy guidance to the city manager. The council must adopt a final budget by June for the budget year starting July 1.

Councilwoman Rose Herrera, who represents the Evergreen District in East San Jose and is considered a moderate swing vote, said Reed’s proposal “sets the right tone in terms of our goal to right-size the organization so we can return to our focus on providing services to our community.”

Upon taking office in 2007, Reed vowed to end the city’s chronic budget deficits, driven chiefly by employee costs outpacing revenues. Since 2000, revenues grew 22 percent while employee costs rose 77 percent and staffing fell 17 percent. But employee unions have fought his calls for concessions, even after a national recession worsened the city’s financial woes.

For much of the last decade, the city patched deficits by eliminating vacant positions of employees who retired or resigned and cobbling together temporary funding in hope that an economic recovery would deliver more tax revenues. But the economic downturn that began in 2008 has eaten into revenues, and the city has fewer jobs to cut.

Last year, when a record $118.5 million deficit threatened layoffs and budget shortfalls loomed far into the future, a half-dozen city unions grudgingly accepted the city’s demand to reduce their pay and benefits 10 percent, a level matched by the council and top officials.

The city imposed 5 percent cuts on one small union, and police agreed to 4 percent reductions to save 70 officers from layoffs. Firefighters couldn’t reach agreement on concessions with the city, and 49 were laid off. Two other unions still under contract continued receiving raises. Still, the city cut 800 jobs and demoted or laid off more than 150 employees.

This year, the deficit has climbed to $105.4 million, driven chiefly by pension costs that are projected to grow from $156 million to $256 million next year and top $400 million in four years.

Next year’s deficit doesn’t include $23 million that temporarily maintained several police, fire, library and community center programs through June. It also doesn’t include a possible $10 million in additional costs from the city’s struggling redevelopment agency. The agency has seen its revenues plummet in the economic downturn, and Gov. Jerry Brown wants to end redevelopment statewide.

Several unions have stepped forward with offers to accept the 10 percent cuts city leaders had called for last year to ease the ongoing budget woes, most notably firefighters, who reached a tentative agreement with the city that will be voted on March 22.

But Reed noted that the worsening budget picture means employees will have to give up much more to avoid further layoffs. The 10 percent cuts would save only $38 million. About 480 jobs would have to be axed to cover the balance.

Reed said the city already is thinly staffed and can’t afford to lose more employees. The city, he added, can’t afford to keep “fiddling around the edges” of the pension reforms he’s sought.

Reed said employees need to reduce pensions not only for future hires but existing workers, including raising retirement ages, reducing automatic pension increases and bonus checks. Eliminating other perks like a provision that pays retiring workers for unused sick leave can also save millions of dollars, he said.

Leaders of the San Jose Police Officers’ Association and a coalition of five other city worker unions said they’re willing to talk.

“We realize that everything is on the table,” said POA President George Beattie.

Nancy Ostrowski, who heads a coalition of five city unions representing about 750 employees, said the workers understand “the dire fiscal situation the city is in.” The group last month offered 10 percent cuts and pension changes.

Firefighters also have offered to talk about pension reductions for future hires with a provision that existing workers could choose that plan, which would cost employees as well as the city less money.

Councilwoman Herrera said shrinking current workers’ pensions is the “800-pound gorilla” that the city must confront to avoid the recurring “Groundhog Day” of budget woes. She also applauded Reed for sparing programs serving kids, including children’s health care and school crossing guards.

“Our children shouldn’t have to pay the price,” she said, “for past bad decisions by previous councils.”


-17
  • Joe_portrait_max50

    SgtJoe1350

    over 3 years ago

    24484 Comments

    bad move !!

  • 1979_max50

    Robocop33

    over 3 years ago

    14642 Comments

    DocThomas, Thank your wonderful family for their service to the community. As they are retired it should not affect them at all. Most Officers in Ca have a unbelievable retirement and even pay standard. Officers there are paid well and pretty much their worth. No community can really pay their police what they are really worth but most Ca Police are well paid and compensated.
    I very much disagree that Unions are understanding and willing to make concessions. Most unions are all about themselves and the Officers come second. Local associations or FOP's are and should be allowed to represent the LEOs in working with the City/County to better their working conditions but national or regional unions only care about their positions and salary and the power of the unions, not the Officers.

  • Blue_crop380w_max50

    DocThomas

    over 3 years ago

    2120 Comments

    It would appear that the economic woes of my home town are only getting worse. They are under the thumbs of the city's politicians, who I might add, have not propsed paycuts for themselves! My Mother is an active LEO in Santa Clara County (adjacent to San Jose), my Father is a former LEO(also with Sanata Clara County) who moved onto to bigger and better things, my Grandmother is the Retired Chief Of Probation for Santa Babara County (which is due South of San Jose), one of my cousins is an LT with the DOC and one of my Grandfathers is a retired Police Captain from Los Gatos (IN SAN JOSE), so needless to say I worry for my family of LEO's (those who are related to me and those who aren't), not only for their jobs, but now for their safety as well. Keep your heads up residents of San Jose, things will get better someday - I HOPE!

  • In_remembrance_of_oakland_pd_max50_max50_max50_max50_max50

    rhood

    over 3 years ago

    23592 Comments

    They are going to be facing some tough times ahead of them, just like other parts of the country.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    Anonymous

    over 3 years ago

    Varadarcop, I don't know where you work, but most departments buy back sick leave when you retire. It's sorta like a bonus for coming to work all those years and not calling in sick. Cuts are here, there is nothing that can be done, so we all just have to bite the bullet!

  • Mourning_max50

    comasterchief

    over 3 years ago

    522 Comments

    L.E.O Unions fight hard to get the pay and benefits that officers deserve. If there is a need to be cuts, in the budget of, public safety sector. Than the city must meet and confer with the union. There the city will find out that the unions are understanding and will make concessions so that the city will save money. We risk our lives on the jobs, please let don't let city administration take away the few incentives we have in our careers.

  • Phf_max50

    varadarcop

    over 3 years ago

    566 Comments

    They get paid for unused sick leave?? What the crap!!? This is why CA is in such dire dog doo. Too many perks and freebies at the city's expense. Gees... public service is about the SERVICE, not getting rich! I couldn't believe what I saw when I read that some airport in CA pays cops $100K a year... that's outrageous. Greedy greedy unions...

  • 1979_max50

    Robocop33

    over 3 years ago

    14642 Comments

    Bump Tremor2, the only thing safe is their salary and pensions that they can collect after one term, or two or four years in office! They love to come after the Police and FF's as that is the only thing that most people are not willing to cut. Let them leave the LEOs and FF's alone and cut into the Administration and their sweetheart pensions.

  • Vpsomourningband_max50

    DonnaLynn

    over 3 years ago

    10638 Comments

    Bump tremor2. All politicians take this stance... they will cut your benefits and dig into your retirement and give themselves a raise at the same time.
    A wake up and shake up is way over due.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    Anonymous

    over 3 years ago

    Here it comes. All over CA cities are doing this. Be prepared CA.

  • Jack_bauer_max50

    Allen705

    over 3 years ago

    1466 Comments

    First, lets take away the mayor and city administrator's take home cars. I'm sure they get one. That will save 100k a year.

  • Sparkle_girl_max50

    Katz

    over 3 years ago

    8260 Comments

    Sucks big time!

  • 309

    Hbryant188

    over 3 years ago

    594 Comments

    San Jose needs a bailout.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    tremor2

    over 3 years ago

    430 Comments

    We as a group can just about forget about being paid what we've been 'promised,' at least the people with less than 5 years invested in their respective PDs. It's likely just not going to happen. My advice to all young people entering law enforcement as a profession is to live frugally, save your money, and invest your salary well to prepare for your retirement in advance. You will likely have to fend for yourselves
    with regard to attaining a comfortable retirement. Don't even think about depending on your municipal
    govts. or politicians to do it for you, because the only pension that appear to NOT be up for discussion
    with regard to REDUCTIONS is THEIRS!

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    Anonymous

    over 3 years ago

    Stay Union strong....

PoliceLink School Finder

Save time in your search for a criminal justice degree program. Use PoliceLink's School Finder to locate schools online and in your area.

Get Info

* In the event that we cannot find a program from one of our partner schools that matches your specific area of interest, we may show schools with similar or unrelated programs.

Recent Activity

Ba_old_glory_max30
Jonas submitted the article: "CHP officer injured in crash, driver arrested", less than a minute ago.
Ba_old_glory_max30
Jonas submitted the article: "Gang members admit role in 14-year-old's death", 1 minute ago.
Picture__sue_patrol_001_sq90_max30
Firstladypatrol commented on: " JIMROC, Moderator 3", 33 minutes ago.