News >> Browse Articles >> Crime News
Georgia Jury Gave Bailiff Breast-Shaped Chocolate
The Los Angeles Times via YellowBrix
January 20, 2010
WASHINGTON – Something strange happened during the 1993 murder trial of Marcus Wellons. Outwardly, the Supreme Court observed Tuesday, the trial “looked typical.” But “there were unusual events going on behind the scenes.”
For example: The Georgia judge in the case spoke outside court to jurors who had gathered at a local restaurant. And after Wellons was convicted and sentenced to die, jurors presented the female judge with a gift of “chocolate shaped as male genitalia,” as the Supreme Court recounted it. If that were not enough, they gave the bailiff a chocolate gift “shaped as female breasts.”
Those “disturbing facts” had been cited in passing in a series of unsuccessful appeals lodged on behalf of Wellons, who came within hours of being executed in 1996 for the rape and murder of a high school girl in suburban Atlanta.
But on Tuesday, the justices said these peculiar gifts “raised serious questions concerning the conduct of the trial” and told the federal appeals court in Atlanta to look into whether there should be a hearing to delve into what happened.
The case has highlighted a serious issue: how much evidence of trial irregularities is needed for the federal courts to reopen a long-settled state criminal conviction.
The Supreme Court did not say Wellons deserved a new trial. But the majority faulted the federal judges in Atlanta for seemingly blocking a hearing where jurors could be called upon to explain what happened all those years ago.
In 1989, a witness reported seeing Wellons dragging a white sheet toward a wooded area. Police later found the body of 15-year-old India Roberts, who knew Wellons through his ex-girlfriend’s son. Roberts had been raped and strangled.
Because there has not been a hearing, it is unclear what prompted the jurors to send their unusual gifts.
“I haven’t got a clue as to what transpired. That’s what we are trying to discover,” said Mary E. Wells, an Atlanta lawyer who appealed the case to the Supreme Court.
cheetah_speed1
over 3 years ago
464 Comments
wrong place, wrong time, but sounds like one heck of a party..
usa_24
over 3 years ago
4994 Comments
How inappropriate. But I don't see how this can be a racial.
uncledennis1
over 3 years ago
22368 Comments
I've been to a goat roping and a cake walk and never seen anything like this. I will admit I did laugh.
Whalewatcher
over 3 years ago
9930 Comments
If I have read this right, the conviction is not in question. So, censure the judge, execute the killer and let's move on ....
ill_taze_u_bro
over 3 years ago
2868 Comments
I don't think that chocolate being the medium in which these items were made of makes it racist. I do think that it is most definatly inappropriate. Should the conviction be thrown out because if this, maybe not. But if this is the type of thing that was allowed, maybe there were other things going on as well. I think that an investigation would be in order (if one hasn't been completed already) to see if there was anyother things that may bave been going on that would have tainted this decision. At the very least, remove any doubt that this is the guy and that there wasn't any jury bias.
Anonymous
over 3 years ago
Ummm... “evidence of the jury’s racial bias” how?
buehler
over 3 years ago
58 Comments
Wait..... lets stop looking at the deed for a second.. if he was convicted by a tainted jury then that would mean he MAY (not saying its true) have been wrongly convicted... It is possible how ever I would have to say I have a good doubt that every one messed up from the original officer all the way to the judges and jury...so I would say I belive him to truly be guilty. How ever I will not say that I belive he should've been denied appeals with allegations of misconduct. I belive THEY (the court system) messed up. and now if he were found to have been wrongfully convicted WE have wasted money to kill (murder) the wrong person and must find the correct individual.... hmmm but like i said I doubt the first officer on the scene messed up and the screw ups continued into the court room..
FireDad
over 3 years ago
7348 Comments
Oh CRAP !!!!!
fletc
over 3 years ago
182 Comments
"Chocolate is racist, don't eat chocolate"
What if it's white chocolate?
The whole thing is weird and undeserving of press until an inquirory has been conducted.
Jonas
over 3 years ago
38534 Comments
Hope the chocolate was worth all this.
Anonymous
over 3 years ago
WASP7000,
Yeah... The thing is too dark...
But, the "Judge" screwed up... LOL
justlogic
over 3 years ago
178 Comments
It is clearly a sign of an inappropriately close relationship between the judge,bailiff and the jury. Apparently shorts(past article reference)are inappropriate for a courtroom. Common sense right.But sexually oriented chocolates are just fine. I smell a new trial coming.
WASP7000
over 3 years ago
998 Comments
Chocolate is racist, don't eat chocolate.
Ahi
over 3 years ago
1990 Comments
werid...
436
over 3 years ago
574 Comments
Did I miss something? Was the chocolate dark or white chocolate? How is this a sign of racial bias in any way? Sounds like counsel might be a long lost relative of Sharptons.